[OldNorth] RE: [OldNorthBoard]

Dan Quickert dequickert at omsoft.com
Sun Dec 14 20:59:46 PST 2003


Andy wrote:
>For the Association not to take a position essentially
>makes the Association meaningless.

I must disagree with that...

not taking a position means just that, we are not taking a position - at 
this time.

Let me emphasize for those who don't know, I am adamantly opposed to the R2 
zoning and think we are quite dense enough. I will work for the downzoning 
to R1. I just don't think now, on this particuar vote, is a good time.

For one, we would need a *unanimous* vote of the 3 council members to 
*change* this zoning. That includes Ted Puntillo.  That isn't going to 
happen.

This aspect of the zoning ordinance - the R2 Consevation District - has 
been known for quite some time.
It has always been stated (by staff such as Esther) that the issue of 
downzoning to R1 was in their view but not practical for them at this time, 
and could/would be taken up later.  But the Association and nearly all of 
its concerned members did not pursue the issue.

Because this issue has been known to exist with this zoning, and because 
there have been numerous potential times for us and residents to weigh in 
on it, and because we have mostly not done so - because of all that, it 
would be in my opinion rather impolitic of us to now say, "wait, no fair!". 
I think the Association would look a little silly as a result.

Far better in my opinion for us to realize that we may have missed the 
ball, and accept that we didn't voice ourselves when the opportunity was 
there.

It's important to realize that nothing is lost here - at this time.

Yes, we need to be heard about 'densification'. Yes, we need to address the 
R2 vs R1 issue. But I think that now is not a good time to go head-to-head 
with the Council on it.

I say we revisit the issue when we have a city council where 3 of 5 members 
aren't recusing themselves - because there is no way in hell we're going to 
win with the current crew. Harrington likes infill. Puntillo is rabid about 
it. Asmundsen appears to favor it. Remember, it will take all 3 to change 
the zoning to R1.

Time is on our side. Haste will gain us nothing in this one.

Here's a proposal - let's send the Council this message:
---
We are strongly in favor of the Conservation District zoning. Let's get 
that passed.
But the issue of zoning density - R1 vs R2 - needs to be addressed.
Therefore, the Association will begin working with neighborhood residents 
to discuss the issue and get a sense of what the neighborhood wants. We 
look forward to working with City staff to develop appropriate zoning for 
the neighborhood.
---
(or words to that effect).

How's that?

Dan





More information about the oldnorth mailing list