[OldNorth] council agenda for Tues.
John Lofland
jflofland at ucdavis.edu
Sun Dec 14 14:04:46 PST 2003
Dan,
We only need to change Mike Harrington's vote to stop the measure.
We have very good grounds to say that the implications were not
understood until Puntillo made the densification claim, which is
denied by the Planning Department.
At the very least, the process should be stopped until we get a clear
reading on who is right: Puntillo or the Planning Department?
And there is the broader perspective put forth in my daft op-ed sent
to you earlier today: What density do we want in the Old North? No
one has as yet really thought about an answer to that question. And,
we should answer it before embarking on zoning changes, one can say.
We might decide that 7,000 people per square mile is already close to
the proper density, being right up there with some major cities.
John
>I just looked at the Council meeting video.
>I'm not so sure that this is the time to fight this battle.
>
>I will try to find some time either this evening or tomorrow morning, to
>look at it further.
>
>Dan
>
>On Saturday, December 13, 2003 7:17 PM, angela wrote:
>> HI guys...I've had time to think this over and I'm not comfortable
>speaking for the neighborhood... this was one thing we spent much time
>discussion (speaking for everyone)... we didn't want this group to speak
>without consent and we have not sought it... I am going to send an email to
>the council speaking on my behalf... hopefully others will do so... I think
>some are interested but just don't like to make waves... so I'll paddle
>enough for them.
>>
>>
>> aw
>
>_______________________________________________
>oldnorth mailing list
>oldnorth at mailman.dcn.org
>http://www2.dcn.org/mailman/listinfo/oldnorth
More information about the oldnorth
mailing list