[env-trinity] Article Submission: Voters approve fracking bans in San Benito and Mendocino Counties
Dan Bacher
danielbacher at fishsniffer.com
Thu Nov 6 17:15:05 PST 2014
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/05/1342317/-Voters-approve-fracking-bans-in-San-Benito-and-Mendocino-Counties
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/11/05/18763838.php
Voters approve fracking bans in San Benito and Mendocino Counties
by Dan Bacher
In election victories for the environment and public health, voters in
San Benito County and Mendocino Counties on November 4 approved ballot
measures that will ban fracking and other extreme oil-extraction
techniques.
Measure J in San Benito County passed with 57% of the vote, while
Measure S in Mendocino County passed with 67%.
The victory in the San Benito was achieved despite a massive ad
campaign funded by the oil industry, the state's largest and most
powerful corporate lobby. Anti-fracking measures also passed in
Denton, Texas, and Athens, Ohio, according to the Center for
Biological Diversity.
“The oil industry’s millions were no match for San Benito County
voters determined to protect their air and water from fracking
pollution,” said Hollin Kretzmann of the Center for Biological
Diversity. “But every California community deserves the same
protection, so Gov. Brown needs to act now to halt fracking’s toxic
threat to our health and environment.”
However, Measure P in Santa Barbara County, an initiative very similar
to the San Benito measure, lost after oil industry groups spent more
than $7.6 million to beat the measure placed on the ballot by local
grassroots groups, according to Sierra Club California.
That spending ranked the local ballot measure campaign in Santa
Barbara as one of the most expensive in the country. "The oil
industry’s campaign relied heavily on advertising that misled voters
about the measure’s content, and outspent proponents by more than 20
to 1," the Club stated.
Kathryn Phillips, Director of Sierra Club California, said in response
to the Measure P loss:
“Winning two out of three county fracking ban measures on the ballot
in California is great news for every Californian who wants clean air,
clean water and a safe future for the next generation.
We knew the oil industry would spend a lot this election. It has given
every indication that it is determined to continue business as usual,
and is unwilling to change its polluting practices, even as the rest
of the world faces the extremes of climate disruption caused by
continued oil dependence. And as we have seen by recent shutdown
orders of injection wells used to dispose of fracking fluid in
California, the oil industry is unable to conduct fracking without
polluting.
History is on our side. Sierra Club members are inspired by the voters
of San Benito County and Mendocino County, and the good citizens in
Santa Barbara County who have shown such strong commitment to social
and environmental progress. Fracking will end in California. This
election shows that, in the absence of a statewide moratorium,
Californians are prepared to force that end in their own communities.”
In contrast to Phillips' statement, Catherine Reheis-Boyd, President
of the Western States Petroleum Association, the lead trade
association for the oil companies and the most powerful corporate
lobbying group in California, lauded the "volunteers" of the No on
Measure P campaign for their successful efforts in a tweet to her
supporters:
“Congrats to the @NoOnMeasureP team & all the volunteers who helped
make today reality! Glad Santa Barbara got it right on science & facts!”
The election cycle was marked by extraordinary spending to influence
elections in California by the oil industry. The Sierra Club said oil
interests ran independent expenditure campaigns against at least two
Southern California assembly members and one Bay Area candidate for
the state senate.
Oil companies also gained national attention for their efforts to
influence city council elections in Richmond, California, spending
more than $3 million on that local election. Oil companies also spent
nearly $2 million to unsuccessfully challenge the fracking ban measure
in San Benito County.
Just days before the election, seventh quarter lobbying filings for
the two-year legislative session were released. They showed that the
Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA) spent $4,009,177.87 in
three months to influence legislators during the period including
July, August and September this year, the last three active months of
the legislative session. That compares to $1.7 million the group spent
during the 6th quarter.
Besides serving as the voice for the oil industry, it is crucial to
understand that WSPA President Reheis-Boyd also wears another hat –
“marine guardian" - that has allowed her and other corporate interests
to help eviscerate "marine protection" in California.
In one of the biggest conflicts of interest in recent California
history, Reheis-Boyd served as the Chair of the privately-funded
Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative that created fake “marine
protected areas” in Southern California. (http://www.dfg.ca.gov/marine/mpa/brtf_bios_sc.asp
)
While she was pushing for increased fracking and offshore oil drilling
in California, the oil industry lobbyist also served on the task
forces to create questionable “marine protected areas” on the Central
Coast, North Central Coast and North Coast.
These alleged “marine protected areas” fail to protect the ocean from
fracking, oil drilling, pollution, military testing, corporate
aquaculture and all human impacts on the ocean other than sustainable
fishing and gathering. The Marine Life Protection Act Initiative,
lauded by corporate “environmentalists” and state officials as the
“most open and transparent” process in California history, was in fact
one of the most corrupt and conflict of interest-infested
environmental fiascos ever seen in the state.
Documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and media
investigations by Associated Press and truthout.org reveal that the
ocean has been fracked at least 203 times in the past 20 years,
including the period from 2004 to 2012 that Reheis-Boyd served as a
"marine guardian.” (http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/10/19/calif-finds-more-instances-of-offshore-fracking/3045721/
)
As if serving on a state marine protection panel wasn't bad enough,
Reheis-Boyd also serves on a federal government marine protected areas
panel. The National Marine Protected Areas Center website lists Reheis-
Boyd as a member of a 20 member MPA (Marine Protected Areas) Advisory
Committee.
Fortunately, despite the enormous influence of Big Oil on California
politics through lobbying, public relations campaigns, campaign
contributions and the industry’s hijacking of state and federal marine
regulatory panels, Californians have voiced growing concerns about
fracking.
A recent Public Policy Institute poll found that 54 percent of
Californians oppose expanded fracking. Another recent poll
commissioned by environmental organizations found that two-thirds of
state residents want a moratorium on fracking, according to the Center
for Biological Diversity.
The public’s concern about fracking is fed by recent revelations
linking the oil industry to air and water pollution. Nearly 3 billion
gallons of oil industry wastewater have been illegally dumped into
California aquifers that were clean enough to supply drinking and
irrigation water, according to recently released state Water Board
documents. (http://sandiegofreepress.org/2014/10/massive-dumping-of-fracking-wastewater-into-aquifers-shows-big-oils-power-in-california/#.VFqHid3DyRo
)
The Center also noted that data collected by the South Coast Air
Quality Management District shows that oil companies have used
millions of pounds of air toxic chemicals in the Los Angeles area over
the past year. A new multistate study published in Environmental
Health found dangerously high levels of cancer-causing chemicals in
the air around fracked wells.
"The public tide is turning against fracking, not just in California
but around the country,” Kretzmann said. “As voters from San Benito to
Denton, Texas, showed, if regulators won’t protect them from fracking
pollution, local communities can and will use the ballot box to
protect themselves.”
Background: Big Oil Money and Power in California
While there are many powerful industries based in California, ranging
from the computer and high tech industry to corporate agribusiness, no
industry has more influence over the state's environmental policies
than Big Oil.
An ongoing analysis of reports filed with the California Secretary of
State shows that the oil industry, the largest and most powerful
corporate lobby in Sacramento, collectively spent over $63 million
lobbying California policymakers between January 1, 2009 and June 30,
2014.
The Western States Petroleum Association, led by President Catherine
Reheis-Boyd, the former chair of the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA)
Initiative to create so-called "marine protected areas" in Southern
California, topped the oil industry lobby spending with $26,969,861.
A report released on April 1, 2014 by the ACCE Institute and Common
Cause also revealed that the oil industry spent $123.6 million to
lobby elected officials in California from 1999 through 2013. This was
an increase of over 400 percent since the 1999-2000 legislative
session, when the industry spent $4.8 million. In 2013-2014 alone, the
top lobbyist employer, Western States Petroleum Association, spent
$4.7 million.
The report also documents that Big Oil has spent $143.3 million on
political candidates and campaigns – nearly $10 million per year and
more than any other corporate lobby – over the past fifteen years. (http://www.indybay.org/uploads/2014/04/10/bil_oil_floods_the_capitol_4.1.14v2.pdf
)
In addition to the oil industry spending exerting its enormous power
through campaign contributions, lobbying legislators and serving on
state and federal regulatory panels, the oil industry also has set up
"Astroturf" groups, including the California Drivers Alliance and
Fueling California, to fight against environmental regulations
protecting our air, water, land, fish, wildlife and human health.
Yet these millions of dollars are just chump change to Big Oil, since
the five big oil companies made over $93 billion in profits in 2013.
This year their estimated profits to date are over $78 billion.(http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/green/news/2014/02/10/83879/with-only-93-billion-in-profits-the-big-five-oil-companies-demand-to-keep-tax-breaks/
)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20141106/c1fae699/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mendocino_fracking_ban.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 41020 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20141106/c1fae699/attachment.jpg>
More information about the env-trinity
mailing list