[env-trinity] Article Submission (Revised): Goliath Wins Against David on Prop. 1

[Dan Bacher]

http://www.fishsniffer.com/blogs/details/goliath-wins-against-david-on-prop.-1/

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/05/1342162/-Prop-1-Passed-The-Power-of-Big-Money-Overcomes-the-Power-of-the-People

http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/11/05/18763818.php

Photo: Governor Jerry Brown, known as "Big Oil Brown" for his  
subservience to the oil industry, is one of the worst governors for  
fish, water and the environment in California history.

big_oil_brown.jpg

Goliath Wins Against David on Prop. 1

Prop. 1 Passes: The Power of Big Money Overcomes the Power of the People

by Dan Bacher

Proposition 1, Governor Jerry Brown's $7.5 billion water bond, sailed  
to easy victory on November 4, as forecasted in a number of polls.

The election results show how the power of millions of dollars of  
corporate money in the corrupt oligarchy of California were able to  
defeat a how a grassroots movement of fishermen, environmentalists,  
Indian Tribes and family farmers opposed to Prop. 1.

The Hoopa Valley, Yurok, Winnemem Wintu and Concow Maidu Tribes, the  
defenders of California's rivers and oceans for thousands of years,  
strongly opposed Prop. 1. because of the threat the bond poses to  
water, salmon and their culture. (http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/11/04/18763767.php 
)

Prop. 1 proponents, including a rogue's gallery of oil companies,  
corporate agribusiness tycoons, Big Tobacco, health insurance  
companies and greedy billionaires, dumped over $16.4 million into the  
campaign, while Prop. 1 opponents raised around $100,000 for the  
effort. In other words, the Yes on Prop. 1 campaign outmatched the No  
on Prop. 1 campaign by a factor of 164 to 1.

In a state and country where corporations have the same rights as  
people, the political game is rigged so that Goliath is usually able  
to defeat David. The state's voters, responding to the avalanche of  
pro-Prop. 1 ads funded by corporate interests, approved the measure by  
a vote of 66.77 percent to 33.23 percent.

The results of the Prop. 1 campaign are a classic example why  
everybody who cares about the future of this state and country should  
join the Move to Amend Coalition. From Massachusetts to Ohio, from  
Illinois to Florida, and Wisconsin, citizens voted overwhelmingly  
Tuesday to pass a Constitutional amendment calling for an end to the  
doctrines of corporate Constitutional rights and money as free speech.

The Amendment states: "We, the People of the United States of America,  
reject the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling and other  
related cases, and move to amend our Constitution to firmly establish  
that money is not speech, and that human beings, not corporations, are  
persons entitled to constitutional rights."

For more information, go to: http://www.MoveToAmend.org.

Farming, Conservation, Environmental Groups: Prop. 1 Didn't Solve Our  
Water Crisis

Californians for Fair Water Policy, a statewide coalition of  
environmental, water conservation, fishing, farming and community  
organizations and Indian Tribes, responded to the passage of Prop. 1  
by calling for a new focus on sustainable water policies and for the  
governor to abandon his proposed Delta Tunnels project to export water  
from the Sacramento River to corporate agribusiness interests,  
Southern California water agencies and oil companies conducting  
fracking and steam injection operations.

"When Californians wake up today following the election, the water  
challenges we face are still huge and pressing," said Barbara Barrigan- 
Parrilla, executive director of Restore the Delta. "Now that the  
debate over Prop. 1 is behind us; it is time to look at sustainable  
solutions to our water challenges. Whether you supported or opposed  
Prop 1, we all agree that it will do nothing to address our current  
drought. So we need to face the fact that the State has over allocated  
up to 5 times more water than is normally available in our rivers and  
streams."

"Proposition 1 will not solve our water crisis," says Adam Scow,  
California Director of Food & Water Watch. "Its proponents sold the  
water bond as a way to protect California from future drought, but  
Prop 1 fails to address the real problems, especially the State's poor  
management of our water resources. Governor Brown must balance  
California's overstretched water budget and reduce allocations to  
water-wasting super-farms in the desert. Food & Water Watch will  
continue to work with allies to ensure that Prop 1's voter-approved  
funds benefit the public interest, and do not promote corporate  
interests by building new dams and subsidizing excessive water  
transfers to unsustainable agribusiness operations."

"Prop. 1 did not change any of these stubborn facts: the Delta has  
been overpumped for decades, and this cannot be sustained, and our  
salmon and other fisheries are on the verge of collapse," said Bill  
Jennings, executive director of the California Sportfishing Protection  
Alliance. "The one thing that must be done if we're going to stabilize  
the state's water policies: balance water rights claims to actual  
water supplies."

"The governor is still wedded to his Bay Delta Conservation Plan/Delta  
Tunnels project, which the EPA has said would violate the Clean Water  
Act," said Bob Wright, Senior Counsel of Friends of the River. "The  
Delta Tunnels project is fatally flawed, and the governor should  
abandon it and instead promote sustainable water solutions."

"We urge the governor to shift his concentration from the doomed Delta  
Tunnels project to large scale recycling, conservation, storm water  
capture, ground water clean up projects, and other new drought  
technologies that will provide local jobs and reduce reliance on  
imported water supplies," said Conner Everts, Executive Director,  
Southern California Watershed Alliance. "Sustainable water programs  
are needed to safeguard California from inevitable future droughts."

Billionaires, Corporate Interests Dumped Over $16.4 Million into Prop.  
1 Campaign

Voters throughout the state fiercely debated the pros and cons of  
Proposition 1, Jerry Brown's $7.5 billion water bond, before they went  
to the polls on November 4.

While the pros and cons are important, an even bigger issue in any  
environmental battle or process is the money behind the campaign. The  
big corporate money spent on the water bond largely determines who the  
bond will benefit - billionaires, agribusiness, oil companies and  
corporate “environmental” NGOs, not the fish, wildlife or people of  
California.

The passage of Proposition 1 was inevitable considering the millions  
of dollars dumped into the campaign by Governor Brown and his  
collaborators - and the deceptive campaign ads run by the Yes on Prop.  
1 campaign cynically employing fear-mongering over the drought to  
scare Californians into voting for Prop. 1.

I have discussed the campaign contributions to Prop. 1 in my previous  
articles, but it's a good idea to review these contributions again,  
now that the election is over.

Contributions to Brown's Yes on Props 1 and 2 Committee totalled  
$13,880,528.43, according to the latest data posted on the California  
Secretary of State's website. (http://cal-access.ss.ca.gov/Campaign/Measures/Detail.aspx?id=1369617&session=2013 
)

The contributions feature millions of dollars from billionaires,  
corporate agribusiness, Big Oil and the tobacco industry - corporate  
interests that all expect a big return for their "investment" in the  
corrupt "play to pay" politics that rules California today.

Contributions to the committee from the period from October 1 to  
October 18 alone amounted to $9,537,048.90.

Expenditures during the period from January 1 through October 18 were  
$10,728,645.50, with $10,149,477.92 just from the period of October 1  
to October 18.

But this isn’t the only committee that funded the Yes on 1 campaign.  
When you consider the other committees backing Prop.1 listed on the  
Secretary of State’s website, the total amount of contributions jumps  
by another $2,541,257.91 to $16,421,785.91!

The “California Business Political Action Committee,” sponsored by the  
California Chamber of Commerce, raised $550,000 for Yes on 1 and 2  
during the period from January 1 to October 18, 2014.

The “Wetlands Conservation Committee, Yes on Prop. 1,” sponsored by  
Ducks Unlimited, Audubon California and the Nature Conservancy, raised  
$215,000 from January 1 through October 18.

Other committees backing Prop. 1 include:

• The “Conservation Action Fund”: $818,623.78

• The Sac Valley Water & Rice For Prop. 1: $44,499.00

• Think Long Committee, sponsored by the Nicolas Berggruen Institute  
Trust, Supporting Propositions 1 and 2: $250,000

• Western Plant Health Association, Supporting Propositions 1 and 2:  
$100,000

• NRDC Action Fund Ballot Measures Committee - Yes on Prop. 1; $9,514.27

• Environmental Coalition for Water and Wildlife Protection – Yes on  
Prop. 1: $102,000

• The Southern California District County Laborers PAC: $58,219.02

• The California Water Association Political Issues Committee – Yes on  
Prop. 1: $100,000

• Laborers Pacific Southwest Regional Organizing Coalition Issues PAC  
– Yes on Props 1 and 2: $293,401.84

While the committees backing Prop. 1 raised over $16.4 million, the  
Vote No on Prop. 1 campaign raised over $97,999, a small fraction of  
the money raised by Prop. 1 proponents.
In addition, opponents of Prop. 1 revealed that the Nature Conservancy  
donated $500,000 to the campaign.

“Prop. 1’s big dam projects will make very little new water, and the  
water will mainly go to unsustainable huge agribusinesses,” said  
Barrigan-Parrilla, Executive Director of Restore the Delta. “Most  
disturbing is the $500,000 that the Nature Conservancy has contributed  
to the Prop 1 campaign. The Nature Conservancy has benefited from the  
gifting of public lands in the Delta by the Department of Water  
Resources."

She emphasized, "The Nature Conservancy turned a blind eye to oil  
drilling in the Gulf of Mexico for the ability to manage wetlands, and  
pumps oil on its own lands. In California, they are turning a blind  
eye to the issue of how water exports will be accelerated from the Bay- 
Delta estuary if Prop. 1 passes, and how this water will fill Governor  
Brown's Delta tunnels. They are supporting water policies that will  
serve special corporate interests in exchange for the opportunity to  
manage more conservancy projects in the Delta and throughout  
California."

The campaign for and against Proposition 1, the $7.5 billion water  
bond on the November 4 ballot, was the classic David and Goliath  
battle of this election season in California.

Governor Jerry Brown, the Republican and Democratic Party  
establishment, corporate agribusiness interests, oil companies,  
construction unions, corporate "environmental" NGOs, prominent  
billionaires, the health care industry and big water agencies backed  
the Yes on Prop. 1 campaign. In contrast, a grassroots coalition of  
fishing groups, environmentalists, consumer organizations, Indian  
Tribes, family farmers and Delta water agencies campaigned against  
Proposition 1.

The top 18 campaign contributors – those who donated $250,000 or more  
- raised a total of $12,005,279 for the Yes on Prop. 1 and 2 campaign,  
according to the California Fair Political Practices Commission  
(FPPC). (http://fppc.ca.gov/top10Nov2014/)

These contributions include $250,000 donated to the campaign by Aera  
Energy LLC, a company jointly owned by affiliates of Shell and  
ExxonMobil.

The Bakersfield-based Aera Energy is one of California's largest oil  
and gas producers, accounting for nearly 25 percent of the state's  
production, according to the company’s website. (http://www.aeraenergy.com/who-we-are.asp 
)

Corporate agribusiness interests, the largest users of federal and  
state water project water exported through the Delta pumping  
facilities, donated a total of $850,000 to the Yes on Prop. 1  
campaign. The California Farm Bureau Federation contributed $250,000  
and the Western Growers Service Association donated $250,000.

Stewart Resnick, the Beverly Hills agribusiness tycoon, owner of  
Paramount Farms and largest orchard fruit grower in the world,  
contributed $150,000 and the California Cotton Alliance contributed  
$200,000 to the Yes on Prop. 1 campaign.

Resnick and his wife, Lynda, have been instrumental in promoting  
campaigns to eviscerate Endangered Species Act protections for Central  
Valley Chinook salmon and Delta smelt populations and to build the  
fish-killing peripheral tunnels - and have made millions off reselling  
environmental water to the public.

The largest individual donor in the Yes on Prop. 1 campaign was Sean  
Parker, who contributed $1 million to the campaign. Parker is an  
entrepreneur and venture capitalist who cofounded the file-sharing  
computer service Napster and served as the first president of the  
social networking website Facebook.

Four members of the Fisher family, who own the Gap stores,  
collectively donated $1.5 million to the Yes. on Prop. 1 and Prop. 2  
campaign. They also own the Mendocino Redwood Company and Humboldt  
Redwood Company, formerly the Pacific Lumber Company (PALCO), more  
than half a million acres of redwood forest lands in total.

Doris F. Fisher contributed $499,000, John J. Fisher $351,000, Robert  
J. Fisher $400,000 and William S. Fisher $250,000.

Tobacco giant Philip Morris also contributed $100,000 to Governor  
Brown’s committee established to support Propositions 1 and 2. On  
October 20, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS  
CAN) called on the governor to return that money.

Folks like Stewart Resnick, the Fisher Family and other billionaires,  
the oil industry and agribusiness interests didn’t dump millions into  
the Yes on Prop. 1 campaign for the common good or benefit of all  
Californians – they did it as a relatively small investment to advance  
their own interests and to further privatize and plunder the public  
trust, including our rivers, Delta and the oceans, for their own  
personal profit.

Winnemem Wintu Chief Caleen Sisk: It's All One Big Project

Caleen Sisk, Chief and Spiritual Leader of the Winnemem Wintu Tribe,  
said the water bond, peripheral tunnels, Shasta Dam raise and other  
water projects now being planned by the state and federal governments  
are in in reality "one Big Project" that will destroy salmon, rivers  
and groundwater supplies.

“It does not make sense that people are separating the water puzzle  
into individual pieces, such as: the raising of Shasta Dam,  
Proposition 1, the Delta tunnels, BDCP, Sites Reservoir, Temperance  
Flat, CALFED, Delta Vision, BDCP, OCAP, the Bay Delta, Trinity/Klamath  
Rivers, the Sacramento River, the San Joaquin River, and water  
rights," said Chief Sisk. "It is all one BIG Project."

She emphasized, "You have to look at the whole picture and everything  
in between from Shasta Dam to the Delta estuary. We need to ask what  
is affected by our actions and who is benefitting from them? These are  
not separate projects; they are all the same thing that the State is  
asking us to fund - California water being manipulated for the  
enrichment of some and the devastation of cultures, environments, and  
species all in the name of higher profits.” 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20141106/8d4c3036/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: big_oil_brown.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 10900 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20141106/8d4c3036/attachment.jpg>