[OldNorth] Memo to City Council prior to Public Hearing on Oct 17 re N Parking
sheryl lynn gerety
winterety at sbcglobal.net
Thu Oct 12 19:51:08 PDT 2006
Sometime tomorrow, I should send the Council members a memo stating our
position. I am circulating the memo for comment before sending it on.
I need board members to contact council members; I will need to speak
to Don Saylor, Sue Greenwald will have to recuse herself (rental on C
Street), and that leaves Stephen Souza, Lamar Heystek, Ruth Asmundson,
important to swinging this in the direction of cautionary
implementation of public policy. We need to set up a meeting with each
on Monday or Tuesday, so assess your availibility and let me know?
******
As was mandated by Council a year ago, a review of the relative
success of the Old North (N) Parking District was undertaken by Public
Works. Empty parking spaces in Old North were counted and a survey
was sent to residents. Summary information from the various parties
will be in your packet. Recommendations have come from the Board of
the Old North Davis Neighborhood Association (ONDNA) and from the
Safety Advisory Commission. Public Works apparently will submit a
resolution to City Council asking that the city issue up to two permits
per resident/business address in the N District.
ON proposed to Public Works that the current system is effective but
might be improved by one change. We propose that the current permit
system remain in effect for the first two months of the annual permit
cycle. After that an ON household/business residential address could
purchase an additional permit subject to the following conditions:
(a) no residence or business could purchase more than two permits total;
(b) extra permits would be sold on a first-come, first-serve basis up
to a quota of 85% of the reserved spaces (that is, up to a total of 145
of the 171 permitted spaces, reserving the balance as open space or for
late purchase of an initial permit).
This modification would, we believe, address the concerns of the
several residential and the one business survey respondent(s) who
wished for additional permits, while protecting the essential functions
of the present district. These are:
1. Provide an available parking space to residents during the time of
highest use -- weekdays 8 AM to 5PM. Inevitably, some reserved spaces
will be empty, and for good reason: they are available for service
calls, for visitors, for midday deliveries, trips to medical or school
appointments, etc., etc. for residents who otherwise have no parking.
2. Leave available approximately 280 spaces (more than 60% of the curb
space) for residents additional vehicles, clients of business on G
Street, students, staff and faculty of UC Davis, downtown employees and
shoppers, and weekday worshippers at the three churches located in or
bordering our neighborhood, weekday visitors to the Farmer’s Market.
3. Gently encourage use of foot, bicycle and mass transit when
possible.
ONDNA is concerned that permitting up to two vehicles per
residence/business will send a signal that there are now two reserved
parking places per residence/business, and that is not the case. We
believe neighborly relationships around the parking of cars would be
tested when those possessing more than one vehicle begin to take
advantage of spaces customarily used by other households. We feel our
suggestion, while a bit more complicated than the suggestion of giving
everyone two or more permits, would better address the most critical
parking needs of our neighborhood.
Should council decide to adopt any modification of the N District, we
ask that it be construed as a continuing experiment which could be
reviewed again at the end of its second year.
Sheryl Gerety
For Old North Davis Neighborhood Association
More information about the oldnorth
mailing list