[OldNorth] Re: Demolition at 721 Seventh Street
John Lofland
jflofland at ucdavis.edu
Tue Jun 21 18:04:37 PDT 2005
Jim,
Thank you very much for this excellent report. We are all much in your debt.
John
At 5:47 PM -0700 6/21/05, Jim Becket wrote:
>Hello All:
>
>Sorry I have not reported out last night's DHRMC meeting sooner, but
>night meetings get harder to take every year, and I felt pushed
>earlier today.
>
>However: Val and I, and a couple of others, attended. Frankly, I
>thought the results were pretty positive from the overall historical
>perspective. For one thing, I think the "new" Commission is
>beginning to settle in and address issues in a more cohesive manner.
>The Chair, Rand Herbert, is beginning to demonstrate his knowledge
>of historical preservation procedures and is also better every
>meeting with meeting protocol.
>
>A brief item by item summary follows:
>
>4. In the Public Communication section, a) I invited anyone from the
>Commission who wanted to write an article for davisvilletoday to do
>so. Chair Rand appeared interested and I will follow up with him. b)
>Both Val and I talked on the ON sidewalk concerns. Staff was
>directed to work with PW to make sure the concerns were addressed
>and also to bring something forward on the previous work done on
>Landmark designation.
>
>5, 6, & 7, no reports
>
>8. No public hearing on the Community Church request to add office
>space, as no one from the Church showed up. The addition of access
>for the handicaped for the front entry caused more discussion by the
>Commission than the office space, as it will alter the historic
>features of the building. A request for elevation drawings will be
>made before it is discussed again.
>
>9. Quite a bit of discussion on moving the bungalow at 511 J and add
>it to 923 Third (the Montgomery House) property, including a lot
>split. Some suggestions were made to alter various things of the
>proposal, but the positive aspects of "saving" the 511 J bungalow
>were stressed. The property owner, who has already fixed up 923 3rd
>to a considerable degree, seems very receptive, and I expect he will
>produce an acceptable plan.
>
>10. The hot item - the demolition (by moving) of 721 7th. The
>outcome was to send owner Dan Dowling back to get an evaluation done
>through the City as to whether or not 721 should be a merit
>resource. Val spoke with considerable knowledge about the history of
>the house as it relates to the Childs family, as well as her
>concerns for the structure itself. She represented ON very well.
>(She did irritate Mr. Dowling by the inference that trees had been
>cut down to facilitate moving - he said quite emphatically that he
>had nothing to do with the cutting, but that it had been done by the
>City.) I did not say much, as the discussion moved steadily toward
>sending it back for evaluation. Since I thought that was a
>good course of action, I thought it best not to muddy the water.
>
>Next meeting: July 25. (That is a week later than normal and done at
>the request of a presenter who wanted the extra week. I thought I
>heard that it had to do with a B Street proposal, but that is not
>official.)
>
>Questions? Jim
>
>John Lofland <jflofland at ucdavis.edu> wrote:
>
>for got the agenda. sorry.
>
>
>Tonight, June 20, the Historical Commission will review the
>application of Dowling Properties to ". . .demolish the existing
>structure located at 721 Seventh Street .. ." (item 10 on the
>attached HRMC agenda).
>
>The building is a bungalow dating from the 1920s and lived in my
>members of the Chiles family.
>
>John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/oldnorth/attachments/20050621/6b2bb518/attachment.html>
More information about the oldnorth
mailing list