From wrye at cognitiveliberty.org  Fri Jun 10 01:41:42 2005
From: wrye at cognitiveliberty.org (Wrye Sententia)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 01:41:42 -0700
Subject: [OldNorth] Greenwald on selecting the mayor
In-Reply-To: <c685b0900506082120cd103b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <GGELLNBEMDCHKKONALEEEEDCCNAA.wrye@cognitiveliberty.org>

Sue,

I'm disgusted, appalled, and ready to rally.  Will come with bells (and
eggs) to challenge this latest local absurdity.

Wrye Sententia
753-9662

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Glen Boire [mailto:inforgb at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9:21 PM
To: wrye sententia
Subject: Fwd: [OldNorth] Greenwald on selecting the mayor


this is ugly.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Lofland <jflofland at ucdavis.edu>
Date: Jun 8, 2005 6:21 PM
Subject: [OldNorth] Greenwald on selecting the mayor
To: Davis History Members
<davishistorymembers at velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us>, Old North
Association <oldnorth at velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us>


The mayor selection matter gets more and more complicated. Here is
Sue Greenwald's view (forwarded with her permission). John



>X-Sender: suegreen at smtp.dcn.davis.ca.us
>Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:04:05 -0700
>To: John Lofland <jflofland at ucdavis.edu>
>From: Sue Greenwald <suegreen at dcn.davis.ca.us>
>
>
>Hi John,
>
>Apparently, some councilmembers have been replying to citizen letters
>concerning the council's actions and intentions regarding the selection of
>Mayor. It seems that there is some obfuscation going on.
>
>  Let me help clarify the issues. Bette Racki confirmed my version of
events
>this afternoon. According to Bette,Ted moved, seconded by Steve,to direct
>Harriet to come back with wording that would change the ordinance from
>"selection of Mayor by highest vote-getter" to "selection of Mayor by vote
>of council." Additionally, they would not accept my amendment to make this
>changeeffective only after my term.
>
>Bottom line: The council has directed staff to change the ordinance
>regarding selection of Mayor, and they refused to accept my amendment to
>make that change after I have served my term.
>
>I should add that, very shortly after the last election, one councilmember
>told me directly that he intended to ignore the directive in the selection
>of Mayor ordinance, and that he intended to be the next Mayor.
>Subsequently, I started hearing second-hand reports that other
>councilmembers were making similar statements.
>
>Given the above facts, I think it would be prudent for the citizens of
>Davis to assume that this council intends to try to overturn the results of
>the last election. If this is not the case, I would also assume that each
>councilmember would have no problem with stating, in writing, that they
>will vote to appoint me Mayor in 2006 AND TO LET ME SERVE THE STANDARD TWO
>YEAR TERM, according to the directive in the ordinance that was in place
>when I was elected.
>
>Finally, concerning the ordinance, I talked to Harriet today and she
>confirmed that when she wrote the ordinance directing council to select the
>Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor by highest vote-getter, she put in the phrase
>"serves at the will of the council" merely to be consistent with state law.
>According to state law, a city can only legally bind any future council to
>any ordinance if it is passed by a vote of the people.
>Again, the "highest vote-getter" ordinance is as strong a statement of the
>rules of the game a city council can legally pass. It has been honored
>without question by every council since it was enacted in 1990. Our council
>fully honored this ordinance when Susie Boyd was a minority Mayor Pro Tem,
>and I was in the majority. What more can I say?
>
>  Sue
>
>========================
>Sue Greenwald
>530-756-5831

_______________________________________________
oldnorth mailing list
oldnorth at mailman.dcn.org
http://www2.dcn.org/mailman/listinfo/oldnorth


--
The Information transmitted in this message is intended only for the
person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential
or privileged material. Any use of this information other than by the
intended recipient is prohibited under the provisions of the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510 et seq. If you are
not the intended recipient, or if you received this message in error,
please send a reply e-mail to the sender and delete all copies of this
material from any computer or other storage device within your
control.




From valerie at vanngroup.com  Fri Jun 10 13:19:12 2005
From: valerie at vanngroup.com (Valerie Vann)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:19:12 -0700
Subject: [OldNorth] UC Davis to Downtown circulation
Message-ID: <42A9F5C0.4185344C@vanngroup.com>

The following from the City web page:

=====
Open House Meeting
Concepts to Improve Circulation Connections and Wayfinding Between UC Davis
and Downtown Davis 

Wednesday, June 29, 2005, 7:00 ? 9:00 PM,
Teen Center Basement at ?3rd and B?,
303 Third Street, Davis

The City of Davis, UC Davis and the Davis Downtown Business Association are
co-sponsoring an open house meeting to present concepts for improving
circulation connections and wayfinding between UC Davis and Downtown Davis.
Public comments on the concepts are requested. 

The concepts to be presented include:  

First Street and A Street intersection; 
First Street; 
Mondavi Center to downtown shuttle; 
Arboretum east entry; 
Third Street corridor; and 
Mondavi Center to downtown pedestrian corridor / ?arts walk?. 
The workshop will be facilitated by the consultant team of Winsler & Kelly
engineers, Wallace, Roberts & Todd landscape architects & planners, and staff
from the City of Davis and UC Davis. 

For more information 

Contact: Bob Wolcott, City of Davis Community Development Department, (530)
757-5610, rwolcott at cityofdavis.org or Karl Mohr, UCD Office of Resource
Management and Planning, (530) 754-9617, kfmohr at ucdavis.edu.
=====

Shortly after the opening of the Mondavi Center
I pointed out to the Mondavi management and various other
organizations concerned with transportation that while 
I live in the center of Davis, Mondavi might as well be
on the far side of the moon, since "you can't get there
from here" by public transit, a situation that is even worse
on weekends and evenings. Mondavi seems to have been
primarily planned as a "regional" center for the 
well-heeled equipped with private autos, and to be 
accessed from the freeway.

The Mondavi Web site's directions all assume approach
from I-80.

Valerie Vann
valerie at vanngroup.com