[OldNorth] Power Play to prevent Sue Greenwald from becoming mayor
Old East Davis
oldeastdavis at omsoft.com
Tue Jun 7 22:03:49 PDT 2005
Old East Neighbors & Friends--
Related in that Sue is a "neighborhood ally", and these days we need
all we can get.
This sort of maneuvering based on a personality is vile no matter
which "side" it comes from.
===================================================
Subject: A "power play" to prevent Sue Greenwald from becoming Mayor
From: Ken Wagstaff <kjwag at dcn.davis.ca.us>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 23:58:22 -0700
Dear friends,
The Davis City Council has launched an outrageous assault on
democracy and the spirit of fair play in our City. Angry that they
did not win the position of Mayor in the last election, the Council
majority has indicated that they intend to override that election's
results by retroactively changing the rules. We must not allow this
to happen!
On May 24 the Council acted on a 4-1 vote to direct staff to prepare
amendments to the City law that sets forth the process for selecting
the Mayor. The current ordinance directs the Council to promote Mayor
Pro Tem Sue Greenwald to Mayor after the March 2006 election. But the
Council has directed that the ordinance be changed to select the
Mayor by a straight vote of the Council. Further, all four members
pushing for this amendment also refused to second a motion by Sue
Greenwald to delay the change until after her term as Mayor.
This action is obviously intended, therefore, to prevent Sue
Greenwald, the Davis Mayor Pro Tem, from becoming the next Mayor, as
current ordinance directs.
Background:
The present mayoral succession ordinance has been in effect since
1990. It provides that the person who received the highest number of
votes in a Council election shall become Mayor Pro Tem. It further
directs the Council to promote the Mayor Pro tem to Mayor after the
next election two years later. Sue Greenwald got the most votes in
2004 and is Mayor Pro tem. According to the ordinance in effect when
Sue was elected, she is to be the new Mayor after the 2006 election.
This 1990 ordinance was put into place because, in a "General Law"
city like Davis, absent a legal directive otherwise, all five
councilmembers decide among themselves who is to become Mayor. The
"vote by Council" mechanism, which was used prior to 1990, had
resulted in nasty, divisive political wrangling. Hence, the 1990
City Council enacted an ordinance directing the Council to select the
highest vote-getter as Mayor Pro Tem, and then to promote the Mayor
Pro Tem to Mayor after the next election.
The "highest vote-getter" ordinance has been honored by every Council
since it was enacted. When I was Mayor, Susie Boyd was a "minority"
Mayor Pro Tem - exactly the same situation that Sue Greenwald is now
in. Neither I nor anyone in the majority even dreamed of abusing our
power by trying to change the ordinance under which Susie was
elected. In fact, I appointed her to all of the important
interjurisdictional committees in order to prepare her for the role
as Mayor (a courtesy that Sue Greenwald has not been afforded as
Mayor Pro Tem).
Two separate issues:
We are dealing with two separate issues here. The first is the best
method for selecting the Mayor. The second is the fairness that lies
at the heart of the democratic process, i.e. if a change is to be
made, that change should not be used to override the results of an
election held under a different set of rules.
1. Method of Selection of Mayor
I strongly believe we must retain the current system of selecting our
Mayor. It gives the people some say in the selection of the City's
major spokesperson. It avoids the bitter, divisive politics that
accompany Council selection of Mayor. But most importantly, if less
obviously, it allows progressives a chance to be elected Mayor. With
the cost of elections now surpassing $40,000, it is becoming
increasingly hard to find citizens willing to run if they don't have
financial backing from development and other big-money interests.
Hence, it is becoming increasingly unlikely, absent a voter
initiative that cuts down on campaign costs (like public financing of
campaigns or district elections) that there will be three progressive
votes on the council. Under the current ordinance, citizens who
want independent leaders can rally behind the few candidates that are
running grass roots campaigns, and, even if they cannot get a
majority on the Council, they at least have a chance to elect a
grass-roots Mayor.
2. Changing the rules retroactively
Regardless of what you think about the best method of selecting our
Mayor, the idea that the Council would consider overturning the
results of the last election-- by retroactively changing the rules
under which the election was held-- is an outrage. This is a crude
power play; it smacks of the kind of dirty politics that we have
witnessed on the national level. We cannot tolerate this method of
governance in the City of Davis.
Act now!
I urge all progressive people to immediately write a letter to the
editor of the Davis Enterprise expressing our collective outrage at
this action.
Letters to the editor can be e-mailed to newsroom at davisenterprise.net
It is important to include your address and phone number, and to
write "letter to the editor" in the subject line.
You can also talk with or e-mail Ted Puntillo, Ruth Asmundson, Steve
Souza, and Don Saylor. Their email addressess are listed below. Tell
them what you think of this outrageous move.
You could also send an email to all your friends. Tell them, whether
they voted for Sue or not, that in the interest of fairness this
change should not become effective until after Sue's term.
If we do our part, Sue Greenwald will be our next Mayor. She won the
election fair and square. She ran a clean, positive campaign, was
outspent by 50%, yet was highest vote-getter by a very large margin.
This Council must not retroactively change the rules under which the
Mayor is selected. The citizens of Davis have always demanded fair
play.
Thank you,
Ken Wagstaff
Davis City Council Member, 1998-2002
Davis Mayor, 2000-2002
rasmundson at ci.davis.ca.us
tedpuntillo at prodigy.net
dnsaylor at dcn.davis.ca.us
ssouza at ci.davis.ca.us
suegreen at dcn.davis.ca.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/oldnorth/attachments/20050607/42ca13b5/attachment.html>
More information about the oldnorth
mailing list