[OldNorth] 630 F Street

[Dan Quickert]

That's a good point, Steve, and one to consider.  It's all a balancing act 
- between the interests of the current resident, those of the neighbors, 
and those of future residents & neighbors - and it isn't simple.

Dan Quickert

On Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:21 AM, Tracy Marshall  wrote:
> Dan.  Sounds like you guys made an effective presentation.  I would
> caution one thing, though.  Consider the argument that negative impacts
> should be born on-site, and the strategy of more lot coverage on that
> parcel rather than a taller structure.  Ms. Hunt's comments are on
> target, but that increase in lot coverage will erode the required open
> space on that parcel.  While that may be fine with the current
> resident, it will have an impact long into the future, after this
> resident moves on.  One thing we can count on is that most of these
> structures will outlive us.  So I strongly believe in crystal clear
> rules, and strict adherence to them.  Then the next generation won't
> wonder why we did this to them.  They'll be mad enough about government
> deficits.
>
> Steve Tracy.