[OldNorth] RE: [OldNorthBoard]

Tracy Marshall stracy at davis.com
Tue Dec 16 19:18:01 PST 2003


We are leaving next Wednesday or so, and staying gone until New Year's. 
  Steve Tracy.
On Tuesday, December 16, 2003, at 05:41  PM, angela wrote:

> Hi everyone... so the 2nd reading has been posponed... what would you 
> all like to do...I'm off for the next few weeks so as soon as I've 
> rested...I'm ready to rock 'n roll ...so what is everyone up to?
>  
> Angela
>
> "Andrew P. Wallace" <ap_wallace at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Andy wrote:
> > >For the Association not to take a position essentially
> > >makes the Association meaningless.
> >
> > I must disagree with that...
> >
> > not taking a position means just that, we are not taking a position 
> - at
> > this time.
>
> Dan, my point was is that we must make some formal statement from the
> neighborhood association. Addressing the City Council only as 
> individuals
> and not through the association is simply not as effective.
>
> Furthermore, in all the email discussion, there has been very little
> specific criticism of the work proposed in the Guideline Revisions. I 
> don't
> see the "densification" statement as an issue directly related to the
> guidelines. The current requirements of setbacks, open space, parking
> places, etc are what define what can and can not be built, not one 
> person's
> ! statement on densification. The primary issue on the table is the 
> R1/R2.
> Esther has said repeatedly in many presentations that this is an 
> ongoing
> issue and must be fully evaluated at another time. But, as Z has 
> clarified,
> the practical difference between R1/R2 is minimal.
>
> With that said, I am in favor of the position that Dan put forward 
> below
> (specific wording aside), the statement should also include something
> related to the parking situation/survey.
>
> Regards,
> Andy
>
> > ---
> > We are strongly in favor of the Conservation District zoning. Let's 
> get
> > that passed.
> > But the issue of zoning density - R1 vs R2 - needs to be addressed.
> > Therefore, the Association will begin working with neighborhood 
> residents
> > to discuss the issue and get a sense of what the neighborhood wants. 
> We
> > look forward to working with City staff to develop appropriate 
> zoning for
> > the neighborhood.
> > ---
> > (or words to! that effect).
> >
> > How's that?
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > oldnorth mailing list
> > oldnorth at mailman.dcn.org
> > http://www2.dcn.org/mailman/listinfo/oldnorth
>
> _______________________________________________
> oldnorth mailing list
> oldnorth at mailman.dcn.org
> http://www2.dcn.org/mailman/listinfo/oldnorth
>
> _______________________________________________
> ondboard mailing list
> ondboard at mailman.dcn.org
> http://www2.dcn.org/mailman/listinfo/ondboard
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 2703 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/oldnorth/attachments/20031216/b759d88e/attachment.bin>


More information about the oldnorth mailing list