[env-trinity] Redding.com: Group claims north state would suffer under Bay Delta plan

[Tom Stokely]

I had missed this one.

TS

http://www.redding.com/news/2013/jun/17/group-claims-north-state-would-suffer-under-bay/ 
Group claims north state would suffer under Bay Delta plan
By staff and wire reports
Posted June 17, 2013 at 6 p.m.


This file photo shows Trinity Lake in 2008. A lawsuit was filed Monday that says a conservation plan for the San Joaquin Delta would take more water from upstream rivers and lakes, including Trinity Lake and Trinity River.
FRESNO — Several opposing groups have filed lawsuits against a broad, long-range plan to manage the ailing Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta that was adopted in May.

The four suits, filed over the course of the past month by environmental groups and water users, argue the Delta Plan does not fulfill its two co-equal goals of providing a more reliable water supply for millions of Californians and protecting and restoring the delta ecosystem.

Environmental groups say the plan would cause more water to be siphoned from the delta, causing further fish declines. Water contractors say the opposite would be true: that the plan would limit the water pumped, reducing water deliveries to cities and states.

Streams as far away from the Delta as the Trinity River will be harmed by the plan, said Tom Stokely of Mount Shasta, a water policy analyst for the California Water Impact Network, one of the lawsuit plaintiffs.

Under the plan, more water will likely be diverted from the Trinity River to the Sacramento River, he said.

“They put policies in place to encourage a Delta conveyance, but they did nothing to analyze upstream impacts,” Stokely said.

Three of the lawsuits were filed on Friday, including two filed by environmental groups and one by the State Water Contractors. They follow a lawsuit filed by the Westlands Water District, one of the nation’s largest water contractors, at the end of May.

In 2009, spurred by the delta’s rapid deterioration and the curtailments imposed on water pumping, the state legislature created a council to come up with a plan to manage the estuary.

The Delta Plan does not call for specific construction projects but contains policies and recommendations. The $14 billion twin tunnel project, which is being developed through a separate federal and state initiative, will be incorporated into the plan if the tunnels are approved and permitted.

The plaintiffs in one of the suits, including AquAlliance and Friends of the River, say the plan failed to incorporate flow criteria, which specify the amount and timing of water necessary to restore the delta’s fisheries.

The group says the plan also fails to analyze the impacts of the twin tunnel project on the environment, even though those tunnels will be incorporated into the Delta Plan once approved.

Stokely said the Delta plan will also mean more water will also have to come from Lake Shasta, but in drought years Trinity Lake is more vulnerable because it fills slower than Shasta. In recent years, water from Trinity Lake has been in even more demand as U.S. Bureau of Reclamation officials ship water downstream in late summer to increase flows in the lower Klamath River to increase water temperature and prevent a die-off of migrating Chinook salmon, Stokely said.

“This document does not meet the standards of the California Environmental Quality Act,” Stokely said.

Chris Knopp, executive director of the Delta Stewardship Council, said the lawsuits won’t improve water quality or reliability in the state. He said the filings underscore the contentiousness of public policy making in the state.

“Some are suing us for using the powers they believe we were not given by the Legislature; others for not using the powers they believe we were given,” Knopp said in a statement issued this afternoon.

Environmental groups want us to be more restrictive; water agencies believe we’re too restrictive. The plan, however, actually walks the very careful line specified in the Delta Reform Act,” Knopp said.

In another suit, the North Coast Rivers Alliance, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations and other groups say the plan accommodates unsustainable increases in water exports from the delta, which will thwart protection and restoration of the ecosystem.

Water contractors, on the other hand, say the plan goes beyond its intended scope and would result in substantial reductions in water deliveries.

In their lawsuit, the State Water Contractors say the Delta Plan could impede implementation of the twin tunnel project, which would carry water underground, replacing the delta’s current pumping system and stabilizing water supplies.

They say the plan also fails to identify feasible replacement water sources for water users who will be required to reduce their reliance on delta water — and does not analyze the impacts of the plan outside of the delta region.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20130626/4899b4d3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: od31a_t607.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 103179 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20130626/4899b4d3/attachment.jpg>