[env-trinity] Resources Secretary Announces Tribal Consultation Policy
Dan Bacher
danielbacher at fishsniffer.com
Thu Apr 19 10:12:50 PDT 2012
http://blogs.alternet.org/danbacher/2012/04/19/resources-secretary-
announces-tribal-consultation-policy/
Caleen Sisk, Chief and Spiritual Leader of the Winnemem Wintu Tribe,
said, ”After reading this short little description of the California
Natural Resources Tribal Policy for the departments, I find it
amazing that while one would think this is a positive step forward
because it sounds so determined to acknowledge and respect California
Tribal peoples, it is without any real commitment other than to
consult.”

john_laird_photo_2.jpg
Resources Secretary Announces Tribal Consultation Policy
by Dan Bacher
John Laird, the California Secretary for Natural Resources, on
Wednesday announced the release of a draft policy directing the
resources agency and its departments to “increase communication and
collaboration with California’s Native American tribes.”
The lack of consultation by the agency with tribes on environmental
programs including the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative,
Delta Vision, Bay Delta Conservation Plan and other processes has led
to frequent conflicts between the Tribes and the state. This failure
to consult has led to many protests, including the peaceful take over
of an MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force meeting in Fort Bragg on July 21,
2010 by over 300 Tribal members and their allies to protect Tribal
gathering rights.
The draft policy letter is available at: http://resources.ca.gov/docs/
Final_Tribal_Policy_Letterhead.pdf
A news release from the agency said, “This will help further the
mission of the California Natural Resources Agency and provide
meaningful input into the development of regulations, rules and
policies that may affect tribal communities.”
“Native American tribes have a unique relationship with the
state’s natural resources,” said Laird. “It is only by engaging
in open, inclusive and regular communication that the interests of
California’s tribes will be recognized and understood.”
On Sept. 19, 2011, Governor Jerry Brown issued Executive Order
B-10-11, which states that “it is the policy of the administration
that every state agency and department subject to executive control
is to encourage communication and consultation with California Native
American tribes.”
The release noted that all California native tribes “have distinct
cultural, environmental, economic, and public health interests.” The
Natural Resources Agency and its departments interact frequently with
tribal communities and are already working closely with them in many
of these areas. The secretary’s direction is intended to build on
those existing relationships, and encourage further outreach and
collaboration.
“Historically, state government and California’s tribes have
experienced conflict,” Laird said. “I intend to improve the
relationships between the agency responsible for the state’s wild
places and the communities that have watched over them for centuries.”
Secretary Laird’s direction aims to “create informed decision
making where all parties involved share a goal and can reach
decisions together,” according to the agency. All parties involved
should encourage respect, shared responsibility, and an open and free
exchange of information.
Laird noted that the policy “is intended as guidance for employees
of the Natural Resources Agency and its departments only, and does
not extend to other government entities.”
Craig Tucker, Klamath Coordinator for the Karuk Tribe, reacted to the
announcement by stating, “Finally California is developing a policy
for consulting with tribes. This would have been a great idea before
initiating things like the corrupt Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA)
Initiative process!”
“If this policy was in place before the MLPA process started, we
probably would have realized a better outcome and have avoided the
litigation that is likely to follow,” said Tucker.
“This is a step in the right direction,” said Tucker. “It is
ridiculous that tribes have had to wait 150 years for a consultation
policy from California.”
He added, “One of the complaints by the tribes is that they are
brought into the process is after the power point presentations are
made. The Tribes should be brought into processes at the conceptual
stage – not after the plan is already developed. This new policy
will help us out.”
“We should give kudos to the Brown administration for taking the
initiative to develop this policy,” said Tucker.
Caleen Sisk, Chief and Spiritual Leader of the Winnemem Wintu Tribe,
said she is happy that the Governor is concerned about hearing the
voices of California Indians, but criticized the draft tribal policy
document for lacking any real committment to tribes other than
consultation.
“After reading this short little description of the California
Natural Resources Tribal Policy for the departments, I find it
amazing that while one would think this is a positive step forward
because it sounds so determined to acknowledge and respect California
Tribal peoples, it is without any real commitment other than to
consult,” said Sisk.
“The Winnemem Wintu Tribe has evaluated the consultation processes
as being highly ineffective,” he stated. “What we do want to see
is how the Governor will install and use the Articles of the UN DRIP
to affirm our Indigenous peoples’ rights to ‘free, prior, and
informed consent.’ I am glad to see that the Governor’s Office is
concerned about the voices of the California Indians, but I would
like to see some solid policies that ’cause change’ because they
are meant to cause change!”
The document states, “This policy defines provisions for improving
Natural Resources Agency consultation, communication and
collaboration with tribes to the extent that a conflict does not
exist with applicable law or regulations.”
Sisk responded, “The reason we need a policy that has some clout for
change is because there are inappropriate laws and regulations that
ignore or suppress the rights of California Tribal peoples that are
all ready causing ‘conflicts.’”
“I do hope for the best to come of this attempt to develop
‘inclusive and regular communication efforts that the interests of
California’s tribes and tribal communities will be recognized and
understood in the larger context of complex decision-making.’ It
would also be important for the Governor to provide a budget for this
effort on the part of the California Tribal peoples, who are always
expected to volunteer their time when everyone else at the table is
on the payroll," Sisk concluded.
The lack of any tribal consultation policy has been a persistent
problem in not only the privately funded Marine Life Protection Act
(MLPA) Initiative process to create “marine protected areas” along
the California Coast, but in the Delta Vision and Bay Delta
Conservation Plan (BDCP) processes designed to build a peripheral
canal or tunnel and other programs managed by the Natural Resources
Agency.
Under pressure from fishermen, tribal members and environmentalists,
the Schwarzenegger administration finally appointed one tribal
representative, Gary Mulcahy of the Winnemem Wintu Tribe, to the
Delta Vision stakeholders group in 2005. However, the Resources
Agency has refused to date to appoint any tribal representatives, as
well any fishermen, Delta residents and family farmers, to the Bay
Delta Conservation Plan Management Committee.
Indian Tribes, fishermen, Delta residents, family farmers, grassroots
environmentalists and scores of elected officials are opposed to the
construction of the peripheral canal because they and the
government’s own scientists believe that it will hasten the
extinction of Central Valley chinook salmon, Delta smelt, longfin
smelt and other species.
The policy will be circulated for comment, with a comment deadline of
July 15, 2012. A public meeting will be held on June 26 at 1:30 pm,
at Thunder Valley Resort, 1200 Athens Avenue, Lincoln, California 95648.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20120419/480f41e6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: unknown.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 27551 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20120419/480f41e6/attachment.jpg>
More information about the env-trinity
mailing list