[env-trinity] Taking a break language from Implementation Plan for Trinity ROD

[Emelia Berol]

Agreed.

Emelia


________________________________
 From: Tom Stokely <tstokely at att.net>
To: env-trinity at velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us 
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 9:34 AM
Subject: [env-trinity] Taking a break language from Implementation Plan for Trinity ROD
 

Attached is the language from the Implementation Plan for the Trinity ROD, which is also Appendix C for the Final EIS for the Trinity River Mainstem Fishery Restoration EIS/EIR, located at http://www.fws.gov/arcata/fisheries/reports/technical/treis/final/appndx_c.pdf. 

Given the public controversy over the mainstem projects, the word "may" should be "shall".  It only makes sense to take a break if there have been problems and concerns.


Tom Stokely
Water Policy Analyst/Media Contact
California Water Impact Network
V/FAX 530-926-9727
Cell 530-524-0315
tstokely at att.net
http://www.c-win.org 

"Twenty-four sites are proposed during the first three years of construction if adequate
funding is available. Additional projects will be constructed after evaluation of the first
series of projects under Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. This
evaluation will be ongoing beginning with construction of the first projects, but an interim
period without construction activities may be necessary to fully evaluate the effectiveness of
project designs and the effect of the new flow regime before beginning construction on the
remaining sites."



_______________________________________________
env-trinity mailing list
env-trinity at velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us
http://www2.dcn.org/mailman/listinfo/env-trinity
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20111207/88d88219/attachment.html>