[env-trinity] Guides, conservationists demand moratorium on Trinity River channel projects
Dan Bacher
danielbacher at fishsniffer.com
Mon Dec 5 15:18:53 PST 2011
http://blogs.alternet.org/danbacher/2011/12/03/guides-
conservationists-demand-moratorium-on-trinity-river-channel-projects/
Photo of Trinity River courtesy of Wikipedia.

280px-trinityriverca.jpg
Guides, conservationists demand moratorium on Trinity River channel
projects
By Dan Bacher
History is repeating itself on the Trinity River as fishing guides
and environmental activists unite to stop a controversial channel
restoration project funded by the federal government.
In 1993, Byron Leydecker, the late founder of Friends of the Trinity
River, got stuck in the mud while fishing on the river with Herb
Burton of Trinity Fly Shop. The sediment was discharged into the
river by a restoration project funded by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
The incident so outraged the two anglers that it led to the formation
of a broad coalition of recreational anglers, commercial fishermen,
environmentalists, the Hoopa Valley Tribe, the Yurok Tribe and local
residents to restore the Trinity River back to its former greatness
as a fishery.
The river restoration campaign led to the Trinity Record of Decision
signed by former Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt and former Hoopa
Valley Tribe Chairman Duane Sherman in Hoopa on December 19, 2000.
The ROD, for the first time ever since the construction of Trinity
Dam, allowed 47 percent of the water to flow down the Trinity rather
than being diverted to the Sacramento River via Whiskeytown Reservoir.
Now the future of the Trinity River is under assault by the same
misguided projects that spurred the campaign to restore the Trinity
in the first place. On November 28, the Trinity River Guides
Association and the California Water Impact Network asked the Trinity
River Restoration Program to “take a break” to determine if river
restoration projects completed to date have met their objectives or
had unintended impacts.
The letter states that there is public concern about significant
filling of pool habitat for adult salmon and steelhead from excessive
gravel introduction into the river channel as well as numerous side
channel failures.
“Numerous side channels constructed in the Trinity River prior to
and since the 2000 Trinity Record of Decision (Trinity ROD) have
completely failed,” according to the letter. “The 80,000 tons of
spawning gravel placed in the river near Lewiston over the past few
years have continued to overwhelm approximately twenty significant
adult fish holding/staging pools in the river upstream of Douglas
City, with no scouring of additional pools to replace them.”
Bill Dickens of the Guides Association said, “There is no choice but
to oppose this type of project until an evaluation of the existing
projects is complete. We are just asking the Restoration Program to
do what is already required as part of the Trinity River Record of
Decision.”
“As fishing guides, we fully support restoration of the river’s
fisheries, but we’re not convinced that they are doing it the right
way. It’s time to take a break and look at what’s been done before
tens of millions of additional taxpayer dollars are spent,” Dickens
noted.
Tom Stokely with C-WIN said, “The Interior Department and the
Trinity River Restoration Program are not responsive to public
concerns. The Guides Association wrote a letter on March 14, 2011
that has still not received a response. It’s inexcusable.”
C-WIN is the successor organization to Friends of Trinity River that
closed earlier this year after the passing of Friends founder Byron
Leydecker, according to Stokely.
Robin Schrock, the program’s executive director, defended the
restoration work in an interview with the Redding Record Searchlight
(http://www.redding.com/news/2011/dec/01/trinity-river-advocates-
denounce-restoration). She claimed the program has followed the
guidelines of the Record of Decision authorizing the work.
However, Stokely emphasized that fishery restoration goals for the
Trinity River Restoration Program are not being met while this
program continues. A review of DFG data reveals that the goals for
naturally spawning fall chinook, spring chinook, fall steelhead and
fall coho were not met in 2010. The hatchery count for steelhead was
not met either.
The goal for fall chinook salmon is 62,000 naturally spawning adult
fish and 9,000 adult hatchery fish. The natural spawner count in
2010, 20,876, was 34 percent of the goal. The number of hatchery fall
chinooks in 2010, 8,953, was 99 percent of the goal.
The adult spring chinook goal is 6,000 natural fish and 3,000
hatchery fish. The natural spring run chinook count for 2010 was
4,477, 75 percent of the goal. The hatchery spring run count was
3,880, 129 percent of the goal.
The goal for fall steelhead is 40,000 natural and 10,000 hatchery
adults. The natural steelhead count in 2010 was 3,811 fish, 10
percent of the goal. The hatchery steelhead count was 4,640 fish, 46
percent of the goal.
The coho salmon goal is 1,400 natural adults and 2,100 hatchery fish.
The natural coho count in 2010 was 817, 58 percent of the goal. The
hatchery coho count was 5,852, 279 percent of the goal.
As of Nov. 12, 4,037 fall and spring run Chinook salmon have been
counted in traps at the Trinity River Fish Hatchery, according to the
California Department of Fish and Game.
A copy of the letter can be found at: http://c-win.org/webfm_send/199
The campaign by the river guides and environmentalists to stop the
controversial restoration project takes place as the Brown and Obama
administrations are fast-tracking the Bay Delta Conservation Plan
(BDCP) to build a peripheral canal or tunnel. The purpose of the
peripheral canal, referred as “improved conveyance” by state and
federal officials, is to expedite the export of water from the
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and the Trinity River to corporate
agribusiness and southern California water agencies.
“The Trinity River is at great risk from increased Delta exports,”
said Stokely. “Anything that reduces pumping restrictions on the
Delta adversely impacts the Trinity River by allowing Trinity Lake to
be drawn down even more than it is already.”
Leonard Masten, chairman of the Hoopa Valley Tribe, on July, 2, 2010
slammed the state-federal peripheral canal plans in a press release
that called on the Legislature to repeal the water bond, Proposition
18, rather than to postpone it until 2012.
Masten noted that the proposition, known as the Safe, Clean and
Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act, “is not really about drinking
water.”
“It’s about building and privatizing taxpayer-built dams and
moving the control of the California’s water from the public trust
to the private sector,” he said. “The measure also paves the way
for the construction of a peripheral canal that would more easily
ship Northern California Water south.”
Masten said he agreed with the statement by Mark Franco, then headman
of the Winnemem Wintu Tribe, that “The peripheral canal is a big,
stupid idea that doesn’t make any sense from a tribal environmental
perspective. Building a canal to save the Delta is like a doctor
inserting an arterial bypass from your shoulder to your hand– it
will cause your elbow to die just like taking water out of the Delta
through a peripheral canal will cause the Delta to die.”
Delta and Trinity River advocates oppose the canal because it will
likely result in the extinction of Central Valley steelhead,
Sacramento River chinook salmon, Delta smelt, longfin smelt,
Sacramento splittail and green sturgeon, as well as imperiling
Trinity River salmon and steelhead runs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20111205/8b16fc92/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 280px-trinityriverca.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 17488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20111205/8b16fc92/attachment.jpg>
More information about the env-trinity
mailing list