[env-trinity] Shasta and trinity lakes
LRLake at aol.com
LRLake at aol.com
Mon Nov 10 14:36:21 PST 2008
All,
Several weeks ago there was a letter to the editor piece in the Redding
Record Searchlight suggesting an "out of the box" solution to increased CVP
storage.
Basically, the idea was to excavate Shasta and Trinity reservoirs during
times of "low water" as apposed to increasing dam height, etc.
This seems like a good idea to me to increase storage. Is there any reason
why this wouldn't work? My simple appraisal sees increased storage, minimal
environmental impact and no change to the existing footprint of the
reservoirs. A quick look at a topo map shows a 30-50% increase in storage just by
removing the earth behind the dams.
Makes sense to me...
Lawrence Lake, RPF
Redding, CA
**************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other
Holiday needs. Search Now.
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http://searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
-aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20081110/01d279ce/attachment.html>
More information about the env-trinity
mailing list