[env-trinity] Sacramento Bee June 17

[Byron]

SAN JOAQUIN RIVER:

Some see a deal to get river rolling; A long-sought pact for dry San Joaquin
could become reality after Monday hearing

Sacramento Bee - 6/17/06

By Michael Doyle -- and Mark Grossi -- Fresno Bee

 

WASHINGTON -- The dried San Joaquin River might flow again, along with lots
and lots of money, under a historic deal coming closer by the hour. 

 

Long-warring parties who beat the odds to become negotiating partners will
march once again before a federal judge in Sacramento on Monday. In their
hands could be an accord that reshapes California's water future. 

 

"The agreement is there," said Rep. George Radanovich, R-Mariposa. 

 

Attorneys for farmers and environmentalists quietly concur, though the final
haggling could well last all weekend. Negotiators are motivated. 

 

They know that if they fail, U.S. District Judge Lawrence Karlton will
impose his own unpredictable solution -- which might hit farmers hard. 

 

"The negotiators believe that it is possible to reach agreement in principle
on the few remaining issues before June 19, and will continue to work
between now and the status conference," attorneys advised Karlton on
Thursday. 

 

Details are cloaked and negotiators tight-lipped. Still, any deal will be
heard loud and clear throughout the West. 

 

It will be ambitious, as officials revive the San Joaquin for the first time
since Friant Dam began constraining the river in the 1940s. 

 

It will be far-reaching, with water users as far north as the Sacramento-San
Joaquin River Delta waiting nervously to see the plans. 

 

It will be expensive, with San Joaquin River restoration costs estimated at
a minimum of $100 million and possibly much more, depending on how the river
is restored. 

 

It will also quickly become congressional business. Federal authorization
will be required for the levees, streambed improvements and other work
required to enliven the seasonally dry river with about 200,000 acre-feet of
water annually. 

 

An acre-foot is the amount of water needed to cover an acre to the depth of
1 foot, or about 326,000 gallons. 

 

"If there's an agreement, we will come together to write the enabling
legislation," said Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno. 

 

Last September, urged on by Radanovich and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.,
the Friant Water Users Authority and the Natural Resources Defense Council
began quietly conferring on how to settle a San Joaquin River lawsuit first
brought in 1988. 

 

The lawsuit challenges contract renewals for Friant, which represents 15,000
east San Joaquin Valley farmers. Arguments quickly turned to the loss of the
river's two salmon runs in the late 1940s when two large stretches of the
river dried up. 

 

State law requires dam operators to provide enough downstream flow to keep
fisheries going. Nonetheless, state officials squelched complaints from
their own Department of Fish and Game and allowed the federal government to
dry up the river. 

 

Then-Gov. Edmund "Pat" Brown agreed with federal officials who wanted to
irrigate highly productive land. Friant's lawyers have always maintained
this is what Congress intended. 

 

But in 1997, Karlton invalidated 14 contracts, ruling environmental reviews
were not properly conducted. After the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear
the case, the two sides spent more than three years trying to settle. They
wound up back in federal court by 2003. 

 

In August 2004, Karlton decided the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation broke state
law by drying up the river and wiping out the salmon runs. 

 

He has been poised since February to craft a solution unless a settlement is
reached. 

 

The politics are as complex as the litigation. 

 

The congressman who represents most of the Friant district on the Valley's
east side, Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Tulare, bluntly distrusts environmentalists.
Nor does he want to release water from Friant for the purpose of saving the
long-dry San Joaquin; at most, he indicated, he "may not oppose" the final
deal. 

 

Downstream water users in Merced, Stanislaus and San Joaquin counties worry
they might be hurt. For instance, some fear they will shoulder new
Endangered Species Act burdens in order to protect the spring run of the
chinook salmon enraptured by the San Joaquin River's new flow. 

 

"I'm hopeful that we'll come up with a solution that works for everyone,"
said Rep. Dennis Cardoza, D-Merced. 

 

On the other hand, a revived river would help water quality downstream,
where environmentalists derisively talk of the "lower colon of the San
Joaquin River." 

 

A healthy San Joaquin would mean higher water quality in the Delta, the
source of drinking water for about 23 million Californians. 

 

But, back on the Valley's west side, another third party worries about what
will happen if the river is restored. The westside farmers who once used the
San Joaquin for irrigation have instead taken water from the Delta for
years. They farm more than 200,000 valuable acres along the dried and
withered sections of the river. A live river will inevitably spill out onto
surrounding land, Central California Irrigation District officials fear. 

 

"Most of the big expense of restoring the river will take place right in
this stretch," said district manager Chris White. 

 

Friant and the Natural Resources Defense Council neared an agreement several
months ago. The struggle ever since has been to brief groups like Central
California, Modesto and Turlock irrigation districts and to tinker as
necessary with the final language

 

 

Byron Leydecker

Chair, Friends of Trinity River

Advisor, California Trout, Inc

PO Box 2327

Mill Valley, CA 94942-2327

415 383 4810 ph

415 383 9562 fx

bwl3 at comcast.net

bleydecker at stanfordalumni.org

http://www.fotr.org

http:www.caltrout.org 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20060619/873ab476/attachment.html>