[1st-mile-nm] IPv6 in New Mexico

[Steve Ross]

Sooner or later we'll find it easier to do addresses natively, so why not
transition as new equipment cycles in to handle new bandwidth needs?

Data center clustering and SDN do seem faster and more secure on v6 as
well. Fewer address translation / transaction steps especially as SDN moves
into layer 2 and even into the PHY.
On Dec 8, 2014 10:42 AM, "Michael Harris" <mharris at visgence.com> wrote:

> On my mobile, so I'll throw a quick poker in the fire:
>
> > IPv6 is critical.
>
> Is it? There is a lot of hand waving and doom-saying about the exhaustion
> of IPv4, but I have yet to hear a good technical argument for IPv4 other
> than "more addresses." Does it offer anything more?
>
> I have various arguments in my head both for and against adoption, but I
> think it is a discussion worth having both here and in the Internet
> community at large.
>
> -Michael
>
> >   The above should be leaders and should have active
> > IPv6 sites.
> > Its not that hard to actually implement..
> >
> > What can we do to help get our State one of the best IPv6 connected
> states ??
> > _______________________________________________
> > 1st-mile-nm mailing list
> > 1st-mile-nm at mailman.dcn.org
> > http://www2.dcn.org/mailman/listinfo/1st-mile-nm
> _______________________________________________
> 1st-mile-nm mailing list
> 1st-mile-nm at mailman.dcn.org
> http://www2.dcn.org/mailman/listinfo/1st-mile-nm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/1st-mile-nm/attachments/20141208/0f9545ab/attachment.html>